Natives poised—again—to affect control of U.S. Senate


Originally published in Indian Country Today in April 2013.

The decision of U.S. Senator Max Baucus (D.-Montana), shown right, not to run again in 2014 spotlights the Native vote in his state. Just as tribal members pulled Senator Jon Tester (D.-Montana) across the finish line in his neck-and-neck 2012 race, they may be positioned to decide the upcoming contest, said Blackfeet tribal member Tom Rodgers, of Carlyle Consulting and voting-rights group Four Directions. That, in turn, will help determine which party controls the U.S. Senate.

“If the 2014 senatorial race is anything like 2012, there may be a 2 to 3 point difference between the candidates, and the Native vote can easily make the decision,” said Rodgers.

Native influence will be even greater if an ongoing lawsuit (Mark Wandering Medicine v. Linda McCulloch, now before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals) to require satellite election offices on Montana reservations succeeds, according to Rodgers. “With satellite registration and voting, Indian turnout will skyrocket—and the only way to get political power is to affect political outcomes.”

Both major parties understand the Native vote’s potential. The Montana GOP is talking to the Republican National Committee about funding a staff position to do outreach in tribal communities, according to state party executive director Bowen Greenwood. “When a race is close, every vote counts,” said Greenwood. He added that Natives’ beliefs in tradition and caring for the land and their desire for economic development match Republican ideals.

For its part, the Montana Democratic Party has long had voter-registration, get-out-the-vote and voter-protection efforts in Native communities, spokesperson Chris Saeger has told ICTMN.

“We are very sad to lose Senator Baucus’s leadership. Federal policy is often imposed on tribes, and we rely on our representatives in Washington to advocate for us,” said Gordon Belcourt, Blackfeet, executive director of the Montana-Wyoming Tribal Leaders Council. “And since both major parties want to reach out to tribes in the race to replace Senator Baucus, they should both support the on-reservation satellite voting offices we’re requesting via the lawsuit.”

Four Directions legal director Greg Lembrich, of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, said there was nothing his organization wanted to see more than both parties embracing the Indian vote and treating Native voters just as they did those in other communities. (Lembrich is shown here, far left, briefing top lawyers from around the nation, who were going to serve as pollwatchers for election precincts on the Pine Ridge and Rosebud Sioux Indian reservations.)

Belcourt offered a word of advice to would-be senators, and to the parties as a whole: When they arrive on reservations, they will face pointed questions about their platforms and policies and will need to produce well-thought-out action plans to deal with issues like decades of high unemployment—in the 50 to 80 percent range for the tribes his group represents—and the effect of sequestration on programs that are already severely underfunded, such as the Indian Health Service. “It’s not a question of Democrats versus Republicans for Native people, it’s how the candidates address the issues.”

Senator Baucus was also what Belcourt called “very receptive” to meeting with tribal leaders. In the upcoming race for his seat, a record of personal involvement is going to count a lot with the tribes, Belcourt said.

Lembrich noted that in 2014 Indian country will also be pivotal in South Dakota, where Senator Tim Johnson, a Democrat, has announced his retirement, and in Alaska, where Democratic Senator Mark Begich faces a tough race: “With no presidential race to distract anyone, we’ll see media saturation and lots of feet on the ground registering voters and getting them to the polls.”

Hanging over all this, said Lembrich, is the U.S. Supreme Court’s upcoming Voting Rights Act decision (Shelby County v. Holder) and a Native voting-rights suit in South Dakota (Chris Brooks v. Jason Gant). “We have some real drama ahead surrounding voting equality for tribal members.”

Said Belcourt: “We’ve been honored to work with Senator Baucus and look forward to developing a good working relationship with whoever succeeds him.”

Photograph of pollwatchers by Stephanie Woodard. c. Stephanie Woodard.

Popular Posts

Nevada Billionaires Have Equal Rights—But Not Natives—Paiutes Charge

Eve of Destruction: BLM Approves Mine in 10,000-year-old Sacred Site

Poor Bear Wins a Round: Oglala Voting Suit Advances